<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If you don&#8217;t like the Copyright Act, join up!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://it.gen.nz/2008/10/10/if-you-dont-like-the-copyright-act-join-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://it.gen.nz/2008/10/10/if-you-dont-like-the-copyright-act-join-up/</link>
	<description>Writings on technology and society from Wellington, New Zealand</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 04:57:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://it.gen.nz/2008/10/10/if-you-dont-like-the-copyright-act-join-up/comment-page-1/#comment-1337</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 18:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://it.gen.nz/?p=280#comment-1337</guid>
		<description>The s92 issue is now covered at this website ...
http://creativefreedom.org.nz/
This is a website of artists &quot;against the removal of New Zealander&#039;s rights through proposed changes in Copyright law&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The s92 issue is now covered at this website &#8230;<br />
<a href="http://creativefreedom.org.nz/" rel="nofollow">http://creativefreedom.org.nz/</a><br />
This is a website of artists &#8220;against the removal of New Zealander&#8217;s rights through proposed changes in Copyright law&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: colin</title>
		<link>http://it.gen.nz/2008/10/10/if-you-dont-like-the-copyright-act-join-up/comment-page-1/#comment-1092</link>
		<dc:creator>colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 03:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://it.gen.nz/?p=280#comment-1092</guid>
		<description>Question - the issue that ISPs cannot tell what you are doing and have little or no choice but to act in the face of accusations. Don&#039;t just listen to me, check out the joint press release by &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.internetnz.net.nz/?p=229&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;just about everybody.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Question &#8211; the issue that ISPs cannot tell what you are doing and have little or no choice but to act in the face of accusations. Don&#8217;t just listen to me, check out the joint press release by <a href="http://blog.internetnz.net.nz/?p=229" rel="nofollow">just about everybody.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Question</title>
		<link>http://it.gen.nz/2008/10/10/if-you-dont-like-the-copyright-act-join-up/comment-page-1/#comment-1078</link>
		<dc:creator>Question</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 09:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://it.gen.nz/?p=280#comment-1078</guid>
		<description>Colin, are you sure?  I checked the section again and it just doesn&#039;t seem to be saying what you say it does.  Do you have a quote of the act that says what you&#039;re saying?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Colin, are you sure?  I checked the section again and it just doesn&#8217;t seem to be saying what you say it does.  Do you have a quote of the act that says what you&#8217;re saying?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: colin</title>
		<link>http://it.gen.nz/2008/10/10/if-you-dont-like-the-copyright-act-join-up/comment-page-1/#comment-1072</link>
		<dc:creator>colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 05:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://it.gen.nz/?p=280#comment-1072</guid>
		<description>By making ISPs liable if they do not act in a timely way, and ISPs are not capable of judging whether a given activity is a copyright infringement or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By making ISPs liable if they do not act in a timely way, and ISPs are not capable of judging whether a given activity is a copyright infringement or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Question</title>
		<link>http://it.gen.nz/2008/10/10/if-you-dont-like-the-copyright-act-join-up/comment-page-1/#comment-1061</link>
		<dc:creator>Question</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 07:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://it.gen.nz/?p=280#comment-1061</guid>
		<description>Colin Jackson: &quot;The thing that’s got me really worked up, though, is the provision in the act that says that Internet Service Providers have to cut off your Internet access if you are accused – that’s accused, not convicted – of unlawfully infringing someone’s copyright.&quot;

Colin, where in s92a does it say this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Colin Jackson: &#8220;The thing that’s got me really worked up, though, is the provision in the act that says that Internet Service Providers have to cut off your Internet access if you are accused – that’s accused, not convicted – of unlawfully infringing someone’s copyright.&#8221;</p>
<p>Colin, where in s92a does it say this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wow</title>
		<link>http://it.gen.nz/2008/10/10/if-you-dont-like-the-copyright-act-join-up/comment-page-1/#comment-1055</link>
		<dc:creator>wow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://it.gen.nz/?p=280#comment-1055</guid>
		<description>On a lighter note, this story has also been picked up by NZs premiere baby blog.

http://www.haveababyforyou.com

Seriously though thanks for covering this and making noise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On a lighter note, this story has also been picked up by NZs premiere baby blog.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.haveababyforyou.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.haveababyforyou.com</a></p>
<p>Seriously though thanks for covering this and making noise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Harris</title>
		<link>http://it.gen.nz/2008/10/10/if-you-dont-like-the-copyright-act-join-up/comment-page-1/#comment-1051</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 01:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://it.gen.nz/?p=280#comment-1051</guid>
		<description>Now at 206 members and climbing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now at 206 members and climbing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidP</title>
		<link>http://it.gen.nz/2008/10/10/if-you-dont-like-the-copyright-act-join-up/comment-page-1/#comment-1045</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 21:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://it.gen.nz/?p=280#comment-1045</guid>
		<description>As we discussed on Thursday, I handled a bunch of copyright complaints made by the US motion picture enforcement crowd when I was running security for my Australian government employer. In no case were we able to confirm the allegations. Most of the time, the IP addresses they listed were for subnets that weren&#039;t allocated. When it was a valid IP address, we wouldn&#039;t find any evidence of P2P traffic in the logs or P2P software on the computer. After a while I just ignored them and their threats to prosecute us under some US law that didn&#039;t apply in foreign countries. I had enough to do without trying to work out why their forensics were so sloppy...

And now I find that their word is law in New Zealand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As we discussed on Thursday, I handled a bunch of copyright complaints made by the US motion picture enforcement crowd when I was running security for my Australian government employer. In no case were we able to confirm the allegations. Most of the time, the IP addresses they listed were for subnets that weren&#8217;t allocated. When it was a valid IP address, we wouldn&#8217;t find any evidence of P2P traffic in the logs or P2P software on the computer. After a while I just ignored them and their threats to prosecute us under some US law that didn&#8217;t apply in foreign countries. I had enough to do without trying to work out why their forensics were so sloppy&#8230;</p>
<p>And now I find that their word is law in New Zealand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

