<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fixing the holes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://it.gen.nz/2008/11/19/patching-the-holes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://it.gen.nz/2008/11/19/patching-the-holes/</link>
	<description>Writings on technology and society from Wellington, New Zealand</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 05:10:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lawrence D'Oliveiro</title>
		<link>http://it.gen.nz/2008/11/19/patching-the-holes/comment-page-1/#comment-1232</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawrence D'Oliveiro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 03:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://it.gen.nz/?p=358#comment-1232</guid>
		<description>I absolutely reject the need for haste on this. The two main killer apps on the Internet are e-mail and the Web. The Web has TLS/SSL, which protects against DNS holes. E-mail leaks like a sieve anyway, and a secure DNS isn&#039;t going to help with that.

Other protocols that depend on security, like SSH, also have their own protections. So where, really, is the pressing need for a secure DNS/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I absolutely reject the need for haste on this. The two main killer apps on the Internet are e-mail and the Web. The Web has TLS/SSL, which protects against DNS holes. E-mail leaks like a sieve anyway, and a secure DNS isn&#8217;t going to help with that.</p>
<p>Other protocols that depend on security, like SSH, also have their own protections. So where, really, is the pressing need for a secure DNS/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: colin</title>
		<link>http://it.gen.nz/2008/11/19/patching-the-holes/comment-page-1/#comment-1229</link>
		<dc:creator>colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 05:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://it.gen.nz/?p=358#comment-1229</guid>
		<description>Lawrence

While these are all good questions, there is unlikely to be consensus about the answers. And just doing nothing isn&#039;t an option. So, we need to find a way through this quickly without endless debate.

Colin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lawrence</p>
<p>While these are all good questions, there is unlikely to be consensus about the answers. And just doing nothing isn&#8217;t an option. So, we need to find a way through this quickly without endless debate.</p>
<p>Colin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawrence D'Oliveiro</title>
		<link>http://it.gen.nz/2008/11/19/patching-the-holes/comment-page-1/#comment-1227</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawrence D'Oliveiro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 23:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://it.gen.nz/?p=358#comment-1227</guid>
		<description>Who do we trust with the root keys? Should the power go to an outfit that answers to the US Commerce Department? To the UN? Who?

Is there a way to spread the trust, so no single entity has ultimate power over it all?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who do we trust with the root keys? Should the power go to an outfit that answers to the US Commerce Department? To the UN? Who?</p>
<p>Is there a way to spread the trust, so no single entity has ultimate power over it all?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
