<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Radio today: does technology change our language?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://it.gen.nz/2009/04/16/radio-today-does-technology-change-our-language/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://it.gen.nz/2009/04/16/radio-today-does-technology-change-our-language/</link>
	<description>Writings on technology and society from Wellington, New Zealand</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 23:10:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: colin</title>
		<link>http://it.gen.nz/2009/04/16/radio-today-does-technology-change-our-language/comment-page-1/#comment-2455</link>
		<dc:creator>colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 04:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://it.gen.nz/?p=611#comment-2455</guid>
		<description>Should be &quot;dinging&#039;.  I don&#039;t always proof-read my notes because they are, well, notes.

Colin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should be &#8220;dinging&#8217;.  I don&#8217;t always proof-read my notes because they are, well, notes.</p>
<p>Colin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Lynch</title>
		<link>http://it.gen.nz/2009/04/16/radio-today-does-technology-change-our-language/comment-page-1/#comment-2453</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Lynch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 03:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://it.gen.nz/?p=611#comment-2453</guid>
		<description>&quot;One its always dining me for, for instance, is introducing a relative clause with ‘which’&quot; - I really cannot make sense of that sentence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;One its always dining me for, for instance, is introducing a relative clause with ‘which’&#8221; &#8211; I really cannot make sense of that sentence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawrence D'Oliveiro</title>
		<link>http://it.gen.nz/2009/04/16/radio-today-does-technology-change-our-language/comment-page-1/#comment-2438</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawrence D'Oliveiro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 23:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://it.gen.nz/?p=611#comment-2438</guid>
		<description>Hey, your clock still seems to be on daylight saving.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, your clock still seems to be on daylight saving.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawrence D'Oliveiro</title>
		<link>http://it.gen.nz/2009/04/16/radio-today-does-technology-change-our-language/comment-page-1/#comment-2437</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawrence D'Oliveiro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 23:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://it.gen.nz/?p=611#comment-2437</guid>
		<description>Regarding Google vs the newspapers, Techdirt came up with a nice term: “Felony Interference With a Business Model”. This is the idea that you mustn’t come up with new ideas (like Google, YouTube etc) that could cause existing, established companies to go out of business—even if such things aren’t illegal, they must lobby for laws to prevent such things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding Google vs the newspapers, Techdirt came up with a nice term: “Felony Interference With a Business Model”. This is the idea that you mustn’t come up with new ideas (like Google, YouTube etc) that could cause existing, established companies to go out of business—even if such things aren’t illegal, they must lobby for laws to prevent such things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
