<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Cloud&#8221; computing?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://it.gen.nz/2009/06/06/cloud-computing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://it.gen.nz/2009/06/06/cloud-computing/</link>
	<description>Writings on technology and society from Wellington, New Zealand</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 07:54:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alisdair McKenzie</title>
		<link>http://it.gen.nz/2009/06/06/cloud-computing/comment-page-1/#comment-4557</link>
		<dc:creator>Alisdair McKenzie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 05:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://it.gen.nz/?p=661#comment-4557</guid>
		<description>Interesting detail on the weather in the area at the time here; http://www.weathergraphics.com/tim/af447/.

For major airlines at least there is already  stream of data from a variety of sensors being relayed from the plane to the engineering base in more or less realtime.
It would be relatively easy to mandate for key parameters to be mirrored to secure storage for use in the event of an adverse event. 

There is a safety/QC culture in several disciplines eg airlines, medicine etc whereby adverse events and near misses are analysed on a no-blame basis (in the first instance)to ensure faulty practice is identified and any lessons have a chance to be learnt. It would be useful to establish a similar discipline in Information Security!
Ezekial</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting detail on the weather in the area at the time here; <a href="http://www.weathergraphics.com/tim/af447/" rel="nofollow">http://www.weathergraphics.com/tim/af447/</a>.</p>
<p>For major airlines at least there is already  stream of data from a variety of sensors being relayed from the plane to the engineering base in more or less realtime.<br />
It would be relatively easy to mandate for key parameters to be mirrored to secure storage for use in the event of an adverse event. </p>
<p>There is a safety/QC culture in several disciplines eg airlines, medicine etc whereby adverse events and near misses are analysed on a no-blame basis (in the first instance)to ensure faulty practice is identified and any lessons have a chance to be learnt. It would be useful to establish a similar discipline in Information Security!<br />
Ezekial</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Perrin</title>
		<link>http://it.gen.nz/2009/06/06/cloud-computing/comment-page-1/#comment-4534</link>
		<dc:creator>Perrin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 06:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://it.gen.nz/?p=661#comment-4534</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve seen this subject come up before when an aircraft has gone down and there are problems finding or recovering the CVR/FDRs.  Google around, you will find many discussions about it.  Here&#039;s a good example: http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/tech_ops/read.main/244248/

I suspect it will happen eventually though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve seen this subject come up before when an aircraft has gone down and there are problems finding or recovering the CVR/FDRs.  Google around, you will find many discussions about it.  Here&#8217;s a good example: <a href="http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/tech_ops/read.main/244248/" rel="nofollow">http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/tech_ops/read.main/244248/</a></p>
<p>I suspect it will happen eventually though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin Capper</title>
		<link>http://it.gen.nz/2009/06/06/cloud-computing/comment-page-1/#comment-4531</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Capper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 22:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://it.gen.nz/?p=661#comment-4531</guid>
		<description>You&#039;d have to have both remoate and local otherwise the whole system is depencdent on the transmitter. I wonder if getting near continuous data from all the aircraft flying is viable esp for long haul oceanic flights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;d have to have both remoate and local otherwise the whole system is depencdent on the transmitter. I wonder if getting near continuous data from all the aircraft flying is viable esp for long haul oceanic flights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

