<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Starlight</title>
	<atom:link href="http://it.gen.nz/2009/08/27/starlight/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://it.gen.nz/2009/08/27/starlight/</link>
	<description>Writings on technology and society from Wellington, New Zealand</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 08:16:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lawrence D'Oliveiro</title>
		<link>http://it.gen.nz/2009/08/27/starlight/comment-page-1/#comment-6378</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawrence D'Oliveiro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 10:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://it.gen.nz/?p=774#comment-6378</guid>
		<description>Pluto&#039;s orbit is highly inclined to the ecliptic (17°) and highly eccentric. Also it&#039;s very small—smaller than our Moon. So once Xena/Eris was discovered, and shown to be bigger, a decision had to be made: either that, too, was a “planet” (along with potentially dozens or hundreds of similar bodies that seem likely to be discovered in the future), or Pluto was not.

So the term “planet” was reserved for really major bodies—well, at least as major as Mars and Earth. These smaller bodies—still large enough to be round rather than odd-shaped like most asteroids—are now to be called “dwarf planets”, or possibly “plutoids”, or something like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pluto&#8217;s orbit is highly inclined to the ecliptic (17°) and highly eccentric. Also it&#8217;s very small—smaller than our Moon. So once Xena/Eris was discovered, and shown to be bigger, a decision had to be made: either that, too, was a “planet” (along with potentially dozens or hundreds of similar bodies that seem likely to be discovered in the future), or Pluto was not.</p>
<p>So the term “planet” was reserved for really major bodies—well, at least as major as Mars and Earth. These smaller bodies—still large enough to be round rather than odd-shaped like most asteroids—are now to be called “dwarf planets”, or possibly “plutoids”, or something like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: colin</title>
		<link>http://it.gen.nz/2009/08/27/starlight/comment-page-1/#comment-6376</link>
		<dc:creator>colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 00:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://it.gen.nz/?p=774#comment-6376</guid>
		<description>Laurence

Doesn&#039;t it? Bother, I was sure it did. Anyway it exhibits enough other pathological behaviour not to be a real planet. There&#039;s a great XKCD cartoon about it somewhere.

Colin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Laurence</p>
<p>Doesn&#8217;t it? Bother, I was sure it did. Anyway it exhibits enough other pathological behaviour not to be a real planet. There&#8217;s a great XKCD cartoon about it somewhere.</p>
<p>Colin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawrence D'Oliveiro</title>
		<link>http://it.gen.nz/2009/08/27/starlight/comment-page-1/#comment-6375</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawrence D'Oliveiro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 23:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://it.gen.nz/?p=774#comment-6375</guid>
		<description>Pluto does not go the wrong way round the Sun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pluto does not go the wrong way round the Sun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

