<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Film industry fails again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://it.gen.nz/2010/06/23/film-industry-fails-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://it.gen.nz/2010/06/23/film-industry-fails-again/</link>
	<description>Writings on technology and society from Wellington, New Zealand</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 08:16:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Film Industry Fails To Meet Demand Again &#171; Creative Freedom Foundation</title>
		<link>http://it.gen.nz/2010/06/23/film-industry-fails-again/comment-page-1/#comment-26588</link>
		<dc:creator>Film Industry Fails To Meet Demand Again &#171; Creative Freedom Foundation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 23:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://it.gen.nz/?p=919#comment-26588</guid>
		<description>[...] Colin Jackson writes on his blog that &#8220;There’s a great New Zealand film called “Boy” – it’s a coming of age tale with a uniquely New Zealand flavour to it. It’s been in the cinemas here for three months, and it’s gone down very well. I’m probably not telling you anything you didn’t know, because the film has been well-promoted. I think I saw that it was now the highest-grossing New Zealand movie ever. Well done to Taika Waititi and every one else involved. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Colin Jackson writes on his blog that &#8220;There’s a great New Zealand film called “Boy” – it’s a coming of age tale with a uniquely New Zealand flavour to it. It’s been in the cinemas here for three months, and it’s gone down very well. I’m probably not telling you anything you didn’t know, because the film has been well-promoted. I think I saw that it was now the highest-grossing New Zealand movie ever. Well done to Taika Waititi and every one else involved. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The movie industry are dead wood — KnowIT</title>
		<link>http://it.gen.nz/2010/06/23/film-industry-fails-again/comment-page-1/#comment-26587</link>
		<dc:creator>The movie industry are dead wood — KnowIT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 23:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://it.gen.nz/?p=919#comment-26587</guid>
		<description>[...] Friday, 25 June 2010: Colin Jackson has written a post that complements this post very well: it.gen.nz » Film industry fails again:  That’s what makes it strange that the film industry apparently hasn’t released the film to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Friday, 25 June 2010: Colin Jackson has written a post that complements this post very well: it.gen.nz » Film industry fails again:  That’s what makes it strange that the film industry apparently hasn’t released the film to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miraz Jordan</title>
		<link>http://it.gen.nz/2010/06/23/film-industry-fails-again/comment-page-1/#comment-26586</link>
		<dc:creator>Miraz Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 23:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://it.gen.nz/?p=919#comment-26586</guid>
		<description>Coiln, I think my recent post on KnowIT complements yours superbly - and I&#039;ll be adding a link to your post in a moment. See:

KnowIT: The movie industry are dead wood - http://knowit.co.nz/2010/06/the-movie-industry-are-dead-wood

Cheers,

Miraz</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coiln, I think my recent post on KnowIT complements yours superbly &#8211; and I&#8217;ll be adding a link to your post in a moment. See:</p>
<p>KnowIT: The movie industry are dead wood &#8211; <a href="http://knowit.co.nz/2010/06/the-movie-industry-are-dead-wood" rel="nofollow">http://knowit.co.nz/2010/06/the-movie-industry-are-dead-wood</a></p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Miraz</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: colin</title>
		<link>http://it.gen.nz/2010/06/23/film-industry-fails-again/comment-page-1/#comment-26582</link>
		<dc:creator>colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 04:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://it.gen.nz/?p=919#comment-26582</guid>
		<description>Nat

I used to have a schoolteacher who would say &quot;that may be a reason, but it&#039;s not an excuse&quot;. 

I like seeing a vibrant film sector in this country and overseas. It won&#039;t stay that way if it sits, Canute-like, in the oncoming tide of technology. 

Colin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nat</p>
<p>I used to have a schoolteacher who would say &#8220;that may be a reason, but it&#8217;s not an excuse&#8221;. </p>
<p>I like seeing a vibrant film sector in this country and overseas. It won&#8217;t stay that way if it sits, Canute-like, in the oncoming tide of technology. </p>
<p>Colin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nat Torkington</title>
		<link>http://it.gen.nz/2010/06/23/film-industry-fails-again/comment-page-1/#comment-26581</link>
		<dc:creator>Nat Torkington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 00:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://it.gen.nz/?p=919#comment-26581</guid>
		<description>Good point: while some people pirate to avoid paying, many people pirate because of unmet demand.  Tthe final episodes of Lost screened simultaneously in a half-dozen countries specifically to avoid this &quot;all my friends are talking about it but I haven&#039;t seen it yet, I&#039;d better download it&quot; situation.

I think your &quot;cheaper not to release and then to go after people who download&quot; is highly improbable, given the arse-gouging rates that lawyers charge.

A motto to live by is &quot;never attribute to malice what can be adequately explained by incompetence&quot;.  I strongly doubt the movie industry is set up to be agile and respond to surprise hits: movie release schedules are set many months in advance, for example to avoid having two big action adventure movies competing with each other where at all possible.  I know this was the case with books: bookstores scheduled their buys, so we had to plan three months in advance.  Even if an author turned up with perfect PDF ready for printing, it would be three months before a bookstore had any budget to spend.  It may well be the same in movie distribution.

Furthermore, as I understand it most movies are distributed as physical artifacts that cost a lot to reproduce.  This is why we foreigners only seem to get American movies after they&#039;ve finished their American run--we&#039;re literally getting the same physical movies the Americans had.  Digital distribution is slowly changing this, but the massive cost of &quot;printing&quot; another movie makes it bloody expensive to have worldwide simultaneous release.

So, I&#039;m saying, the current structure of the movie industry may not permit surprise hits to be immediately released in obviously relevant markets. (And every NZ hit movie is a &quot;surprise hit&quot; to an Australian :).  Yes, Boy was big in NZ.  I figure that means that, a month or so after the movie came out, distributors in Australia could then be told &quot;this is genuinely good&quot;.  Then they will have said, &quot;ok, when can you get us the reels, when do we have budget,&quot; and scheduled distribution accordingly far in advance.

What I&#039;m saying is that it&#039;s possible that nobody&#039;s a major villain here.  NZ&#039;s film industry may never have been able to have Boy ready for near-simultaneous release in Aus.  They may not have been able to quickly react to Boy&#039;s success with a release in Aus.  The closest thing to a villain is whoever leaked the screener, because in those circles you MUST know what the consequences of that act will be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point: while some people pirate to avoid paying, many people pirate because of unmet demand.  Tthe final episodes of Lost screened simultaneously in a half-dozen countries specifically to avoid this &#8220;all my friends are talking about it but I haven&#8217;t seen it yet, I&#8217;d better download it&#8221; situation.</p>
<p>I think your &#8220;cheaper not to release and then to go after people who download&#8221; is highly improbable, given the arse-gouging rates that lawyers charge.</p>
<p>A motto to live by is &#8220;never attribute to malice what can be adequately explained by incompetence&#8221;.  I strongly doubt the movie industry is set up to be agile and respond to surprise hits: movie release schedules are set many months in advance, for example to avoid having two big action adventure movies competing with each other where at all possible.  I know this was the case with books: bookstores scheduled their buys, so we had to plan three months in advance.  Even if an author turned up with perfect PDF ready for printing, it would be three months before a bookstore had any budget to spend.  It may well be the same in movie distribution.</p>
<p>Furthermore, as I understand it most movies are distributed as physical artifacts that cost a lot to reproduce.  This is why we foreigners only seem to get American movies after they&#8217;ve finished their American run&#8211;we&#8217;re literally getting the same physical movies the Americans had.  Digital distribution is slowly changing this, but the massive cost of &#8220;printing&#8221; another movie makes it bloody expensive to have worldwide simultaneous release.</p>
<p>So, I&#8217;m saying, the current structure of the movie industry may not permit surprise hits to be immediately released in obviously relevant markets. (And every NZ hit movie is a &#8220;surprise hit&#8221; to an Australian :).  Yes, Boy was big in NZ.  I figure that means that, a month or so after the movie came out, distributors in Australia could then be told &#8220;this is genuinely good&#8221;.  Then they will have said, &#8220;ok, when can you get us the reels, when do we have budget,&#8221; and scheduled distribution accordingly far in advance.</p>
<p>What I&#8217;m saying is that it&#8217;s possible that nobody&#8217;s a major villain here.  NZ&#8217;s film industry may never have been able to have Boy ready for near-simultaneous release in Aus.  They may not have been able to quickly react to Boy&#8217;s success with a release in Aus.  The closest thing to a villain is whoever leaked the screener, because in those circles you MUST know what the consequences of that act will be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Lane</title>
		<link>http://it.gen.nz/2010/06/23/film-industry-fails-again/comment-page-1/#comment-26579</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Lane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 23:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://it.gen.nz/?p=919#comment-26579</guid>
		<description>Colin, excellent analysis (with suitable references) as always. I&#039;ll be referring a few of my friends - who voiced concern after the news broke - to this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Colin, excellent analysis (with suitable references) as always. I&#8217;ll be referring a few of my friends &#8211; who voiced concern after the news broke &#8211; to this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

